Speech, interaction and identity: the construction of Odysseus' ethos in the apólogoi (Hom. Od. IX-XII)

Main Article Content

Miqueas Baruc Gatti

Abstract

The present study undertakes an analysis of the construction of Odysseus’ discursive ethos in the apólogoi (Homer, Odyssey IX-XII), a speech the hero delivers, according to Most (1984), in order to persuade the Phaeacians to be nice hosts. Indeed, based on some insights from interactional narrativity studies (Carranza, 2020), this paper considers Odysseus’ tale’s interactional aspects: specifically, the distribution of the roles of hosts and guest —established by the codes of xenía—, Odysseus’ political status, the representations of an epic hero and a basiléus, which Odysseus uses to his advantage, and the conversational and interactional history previous to book IX. Thus, Odysseus’ ethos in the apólogoi is as relevant as his prior ethos (Amossy, 2018), that is, the discursive image that Odysseus projects during his first encounters with the Phaeacians (VIII-VIII) and reworks and fosters from book IX onwards. The research’s general aim is to understand Odysseus’ account as an argumentative speech, through which the hero constructs a certain self-presentation, conditioned by the interactional frame in which the storytelling takes place, in order to convince the Phaeacians to obey the hospitality laws. On a deeper level, Odysseus’ self-presentation is strongly tied to the reconstruction of his lost identity and the recovery of his political and social status as Ithaca’s basiléus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Baruc Gatti, M. (2026). Speech, interaction and identity: the construction of Odysseus’ ethos in the apólogoi (Hom. Od. IX-XII). Rétor, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.61146/retor.v16.n1.273
Section
Artículos

References

Amossy, R. (2018). La presentación de sí. Ethos e identidad verbal. Buenos Aires: Prometeo Editorial.

Carranza, I. (2020). Narrativas interaccionales. Una mirada sociolingüística a la actividad de narrar en encuentros sociales. Córdoba: Departamento Editorial de la Facultad de Lenguas. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.

De Jong, I. (1992). The Subjective Style in Odysseus’ Wanderings. The Classical Quarterly, 42(1), 1-11.

De Jong, I. (2004). A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ferrari, F. (2001). Odissea. Turín: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.

Heubeck, A., West, S. & Hainsworth, J. B. (1990). A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Vol. I. Introduction and Books I-VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hopman, M. (2012). Narrative and Rhetoric in Odysseus’ Tales to the Phaecians. American Journal of Philology, (133), 1-30.

King, B. (1999). The Rhetoric of the Victim: Odysseus in the Swineherd’s Hut. Classical Antiquity, 18(1), 74-93.

Knudsen, R. (2014). Homeric Speech and the Origins of Rhetoric. Lugar: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Maingueneau, D. (1997). Novas tendencias em análise do discurso. Campinas: Editora UNICAMP.

Maingueneau, D. (2002). Problèmes d’ethos. Pratiques: linguistique, littérature, didactique, 113-114, 55-67.

Maingueneau, D. (2003). Términos clave del análisis del discurso. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Most, G. (1989). The Structure and Function of Odysseus’ Apologoi. Transactions of the American Philological Association, 119, 15-30.

Reece, S. (1993). The Stranger’s Welcome: Oral Theory and the Aesthetics of the Homeric Hospitality Scene. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Ross, W. D. (1959). Aristotelis Ars Rhetorica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Semêdo, R. (2018). Od. 8.548: Ocultação e verdade no questionamento de Alcínoo a Odisseu. Ágora. Estudos Clássicos em debate, (20), 11-31.

Semêdo, R. (2020). Rhetoric in Homer? An Analysis of Odysseus’ Supplication to Nausicaa in Odyssey 6 (135-97). Nunt. Antiquus, 16(1), 13-34.