The controversial discourse in the debate about the Integral Sexual Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this article, we analyze with tools of the Discourse Analysis the positions that were manifested on the project of Integral Sexual Education in the parliamentary debate that took place in the Chamber of Deputies, on August 16, 2006. Beyond the pronouncement in favor or against the sanction of the law, we are interested in investigating the argumentative logics (Angenot, 2015) that develop the different positions on the project, that is, determine whether or not they share the same framework of beliefs, if the argumentative proposals start of the same budgets, necessary condition to establish the bases for the discussion in view of an eventual consensus on the subject.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Las obras se dan a conocer en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que i) se citen la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se utilicen para fines comerciales; y iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.