Symbolic Violence And Rhetoric. Reyna Haydee Ramirez vs. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador
Main Article Content
Abstract
The political strength and popular support that Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador obtained after his election as President of the Republic in 2018 was fed and nourished throughout his six-year term, mainly from the morning conferences in which he polemizes, refutes, and argues – always in a monologic way – his “enemies and adversaries” among whom are journalists and reporters from media outlets that are not in line with his government. After the victory in the election of his candidate on June the 2th, the president praised his government plan, achievements, figures, and so on. In this context, journalists critical of his regime questioned him. Such is the case with Reyna Haydee Ramirez Hernandez. This paper aims to show how symbolic violence (Bourdieu, 2000) is used as an expression of rhetorical and argumentative resources in the discursive interaction between Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador and reporter Reyna Ramirez at the Mexico’s President morning press conference on June the 28th, 2024. Based on imaginary formations (Pêcheux, 1978) and speech acts (Haverkate, 2006), the strategies of impoliteness (Kaul, 2008) employed by both are reviewed, and how they function as rhetorical resources and multimodal arguments (Gilbert, 1994) to safeguard self-image (Goffman, 1967) is shown.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Las obras se dan a conocer en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional. Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que i) se citen la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se utilicen para fines comerciales; y iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
References
Bolívar, A. (2012). «Political apologies by heads of state in diplomatic conflicts. Between sincerity and political cynicism». En Cantarini, S. [autor]. Dialogue: state of the art. Studies in memory of Sorin Stati (pp 89-104). München: LINCOM.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). La dominación masculina, [Trad. Joaquín Jordá], Barcelona: Anagrama.
Gilbert, M. (1994). «Multi-modal argumentation» en Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol 24, Number 2, pp. 159-177.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Doubleday.
Haverkate, H. (2006). «Aspectos pragmalingüísticos de la interrogación en español con atención especial a las secuencias de preguntas» en Cultura, lenguaje y representación, Revista de estudios culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, Vol. III, pp. 27-40.
Kaul de Marlangeon, S. (2008). «Tipología del comportamiento verbal descortés en español» en Hernández-Flores, N., Briz, A., Hidalgo, A., Albelda M. & Contreras, J. (red.), Cortesía y conversación: de lo escrito a lo oral (pp. 254-266). Universitat de València and Programa EDICE.
Lim, Y.-O.; Suh, K.-H. (2022). «Development and Validation of a Measure of Passive Aggression Traits: The Passive Aggression Scale (PAS) » in Behav. Sci., 12, 273. https:// doi.org/10.3390/bs12080273.
Maingueneau, D. (2010). «El enunciador encarnado. La problemática del Ethos» en Versión 24, México: UAM-X, pp. 203-225.
Pêcheux, M. (1978). Hacia el análisis automático del discurso [Trad. Manuel Alvar], Madrid: BAC.
Romera, A. (2005). Retóricas. Manual de retórica y recursos estilísticos. http://retorica.librodenotas.com/.
Wetzler, S. (1992). Living with the passive-aggressive man, Simon & Schuster: UCLA.