Persuasion and Political Discourse: A corpus-driven triggers recognition

Main Article Content

Pablo Cervantes Aguilera
Antonio Reyes Pérez

Abstract

This article is focused on analyzing the political discourse of Mexico’s last three presidents. The objective is to identify linguistic patterns related to the phenomenon of persuasion. A corpus of 15 presidential speeches was compiled and processed by using Corpus Linguistics tools to detect lexical triggers associated with psychological principles of persuasion. The findings describe how linguistic information is used to create a persuasive communication, and highlight differences among the presidents’ speeches, suggesting underlying motivations. The results offer an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenon of persuasion in Mexican political discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Cervantes Aguilera , P., & Reyes Pérez, A. (2026). Persuasion and Political Discourse: A corpus-driven triggers recognition. Rétor, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.61146/retor.v16.n1.278
Section
Dossier

References

Albarracin, D., Sunderrajan, A., Lohmann, S., Chan, M.-P. S., & Jiang, D. (2018). The psychology of attitudes, motivation, and persuasion. In D. Albarracin & B. T. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes. Routledge.

Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (Version 3.4.3) [Software]. Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Cialdini, R. B. (2001). The science of persuasion. Scientific American, 284(2), 76–81. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26059056

Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (Eds.). (2012). The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218410

Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2003). Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235

FrameNet Project. (n.d.). Berkeley FrameNet. https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu. (Consultado el 8 de abril de 2025)

Guerini, M., Özbal, G., & Strapparava, C. (2015). Echoes of persuasion: The effect of euphony in persuasive communication. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1508.05817

Hosman, L. A. (2002). Language and persuasion. En J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 371–390). SAGE.

Kemp, C. D., & Kemp, A. W. (1956). Generalized hypergeometric distributions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 18(2), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1956.tb00224.x

O’Keefe, D. J. (2006). Persuasion. En J. O. Greene & B. R. Burleson (Eds.), The handbook of communication skills (3rd ed., pp. 232–341). Routledge.

O’Keefe, D. J. (2018). Persuasion. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), The handbook of communication skills (pp. 319–335). Routledge.

Quesada Pacheco, J. A. (1989). Aportes de la lingüística al estudio del discurso persuasivo. Revista de Filología y Lingüística de la Universidad de Costa Rica, 15(1), 95–104. https://revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/filyling/article/view/19134/19192

Real Academia Española. (2024). Persuadir. En Diccionario de la lengua española (24.ª ed.). https://dle.rae.es/persuadir

Ratinaud, P. (2009). IRaMuTeQ [Software]. http://iramuteq.org/

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2006). Relevance theory. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 606–632). Blackwell.

Woods, N. (2006). Describing discourse: A practical guide to discourse analysis. Hodder Arnold.